State by State Statutes for Wiretap, Surveillance, Recording Calls and Eavesdropping

 Wiretap Evidence Expert
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA)
 
updated 10/24/2008 Ben Levitan is an acknowledged industry expert, pioneer and patent holder in wireless, wire line and Internet protocol (IP) lawfully authorized electronic surveillance (LAES) systems.
 
Ben Levitan
919-420-0924
919-605-3003 (mobile)
benlev@aol.com

State

Cite

Includes Photo/Video

Includes Cell phones

Specially mentions "electronic" or "computer"?

Notes

Party Consent

Alabama Ala. Code §13A-11-30 yes - Ala. 
Code § 13A-11-32
      1
Alaska §42.20.310 yes, if contain nudity - Alaska Stat. § 11.61.123. yes yes   1
Arizona Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §13-3005   yes yes    1
Arkansas Ark. Code §5-60-120 Ark. Code §5-16-101 yes - Ark. Code §5-16-101 yes yes   1
California Cal. Penal Code §631, 632 yes - Cal. Penal Code §647 yes yes one party may tap phone if related to serious crime; includes pagers all
Colorado Colo Rev. Stat. §18-9-303   yes yes   1
Connecticut Conn. Gen. Stat. §52-570d: yes - §31-48b(b) yes yes law enforcement must get approval by panel of judges for taps all
Delaware Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, §2402(c)(4) yes - Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 1335(2), (6)    "trespass by other means of communicating privately" under invasion of privacy law all
DC D.C. Code Ann. §23-542       tapes kept until ordered to be destroyed by judge 1
Florida Fla. Stat. ch. 934.03   yes yes business recordings do not violate law all
Georgia Ga. Code Ann. §16-11-62 yes yes yes phone companies must keep public list of all subscribers using monitoring equipment 1
Hawaii Haw. Rev. Stat. §803-42   yes yes   all
Idaho Idaho Code §18-6702     yes   1
Illinois 720 ILCS 5/. yes - 720 Ill. Compiled Stat. Ann. 5/26-4(a)    yes business may monitor employees at work all
Indiana Ind. Code Ann. §35-33.5-1-5     yes   1
Iowa Iowa Code §727.8     "communication of any kind,"   1
Kansas Kan. Stat. Ann. §21-4001 yes       1
Kentcky Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §526.010   yes - Ky. Att'y Gen. Op. 84-310   Divulging information obtained through illegal eavesdropping is a separate crime classified as a misdemeanor  1
Louisiana La. Rev. Stat. §15:1303 yes - La. Rev. Stat. § 14:283    yes telephone companies may intercept lewd calls all
Maine Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 15
§709
yes - Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, §511.       1
Maryland Md. Code Ann., Courts and Judicial Proceedings §10-402     yes - § 10-410.  State courts interpreted laws to protect communications only when parties have a reasonable expectation of privacy all
Massachusetts Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 272 , §99         all
Michigan Mich. Comp. Laws §750.539c yes - 750.539d        all
Minnesota Minn. Stat. §626A.02     yes - 626A.02    1
Mississippi Miss. Code Ann.§41-29-501 to -537 yes - Miss. Code Ann. § 97-29-63   "other communications"   1
Missouri Mo. Rev. Stat. §542.402 yes - Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.253.       1
Montana Mont. Code Ann. §45-8-213     yes - "electronic mail" exceptions for hostage situations all
Nebraska Neb. Rev. Stat. §86-701   yes yes    1
Nevada Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. §200.620   yes - "wireless methods"     all by court descision
New Hampshire N. H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §570-A:2 yes - NH Rev Stat §644:9       all
New Jersey N.J. Stat. §2A:156A-3     yes   1
New Mexico N.M. Stat. Ann. §30-12-1         1
New York N.Y. Penal Law §250.00, 250.05 yes - Gen. Bus. Law 395-b   yes   1
North Carolina N.C. Gen. Stat. §15A-287; §14-155.     yes - § 15A-287   1
North Dakota N.D. Cent. Code §12.1-15-02         1
Ohio Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §2933.52     yes   1
Okalahoma Okla. Stat. tit.
§13-176.2
    yes   1
Oregon Or. Rev. Stat. §165.540, 165.543
§133.005
yes - Ore. Rev. Stat. § 163.700.       1
Pennsylvania 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §5703     yes perhaps toughest law in the states; forbids even police officers from tapping all
Rhode Island R.I. Gen. Laws §11-35-21
§12-5.1
    yes   1
South Carolina S.C. Code Ann. §16-17-470 yes - under "peeping tom" provision     does not explicitly address interception of wire or electronic communication; does including record; misdemeanor to eavesdrop ("peeping Tom") law all 
South Dakota S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20  yes - S.D. Codified Laws § 22-21-1       1
Tennessee Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601 yes - § 39-13-605 yes - § 39-13-604.  yes   1
Texas Texas Penal Code § 16.02, 18.20     yes   1
Utah Utah Code Ann. § 77-23a-4 yes - § 76-9-402.   yes   1
Vermont no law specifically addressing interception of communications but state's highest court held electronic monitoring of communications in a person's home is unlawful invasion of privacy
Virginia Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-62      yes   1
Washington Wash. Rev. Code § 9.73.030         all
West Virginia W. Va. Code § 62-1D-3      yes   1
Wisconsin Wis. Stat. § 968.31     yes   1
Wyoming Wyo. Stat. § 7-3-701   yes yes   1
             

 TOTALS

 

 21

 14

 31

 

33=1 party 

16=all party 

 

 

       
         

All Rights Reserved | Copyright © 2007 | Home | Wiretap Evidence Expert | Intellectual Property Rights | E911          Designed by PRstore